I don't understand.
The federal government is paying columnists and commentators to parrot the same crap they'd have said anyway, and that's stupidity, but I can understand why they might think to do it, wrongheaded though it may be. What I can't understand is this:
Who is Mike McManus?
Who thought Armstrong Williams matters?
Why would anyone consider Maggie Gallagher worth buying off?
I'm familiar with most of your big-time pundit types. I'm familiar with the big bloggers, too. Armstrong Williams is a marginal character- he has radio and TV shows, only they don't air on stations with any audience, so his influence can't be big. Ditto Maggie Gallagher- I've seen her column in the New York Post, but she's one of those writers that's just, you know, there- nothing remarkable, no household name. Mike McManus? Absolutely, positively never heard of the guy. Blank. Zip.
Why would anyone think he was worth buying off?
I imagine the Bush people holding a list of commentators and ticking off the unlikelies- "Safire? Nah... Will? No way..." Then down to "Max Boot? Nope... Podhoretz? He wouldn't..." And so on, until it's "Elroy Lardbottom of the Pensacola Weekly Objectionist-Curmudgeon? Probably not... Gashley Crumboski of WELP 'Whelp 106' in Opelousas? Maybe... ah, no, don't think so...." And after that's when you hit Mike McManus.
I guess. Frankly, the name rings no bells.
Here he is, shilling for something called "Lovegevity." It says he's in over 100 papers; the articles today said he's in 50. That means he's in a lot less than that, probably, and they're likely to be the Springfield Shopper or the Arlen (TX) Bystander. Turns out- I Googled the guy- he's syndicated by the New York Times Syndicate, which is NOT the same thing as being in the New York Times. No, he writes a column called "Ethics and Religion," and apparently, allegedly, he kinda missed the point of the first part. Regardless, I still haven't heard of him.
(Fun fact- on one page, I found a column where he recommends books on marriage, including one by... wait for it... Maggie Gallagher. Evidently, there's a network of these people)
So we have an administration both wrongheaded enough to spend tax money to buy off columnists and stupid enough to select columnists with absolutely no juice, no influence, nothing. Maybe those are the only ones who would let themselves be purchased, but I doubt that. They just came cheaper, that's all. And I guess the folks in this administration are looking for bargains. They got what they paid for.
Maybe next time, they'll try buying off bloggers. We know Kos is available.
Share