The L.A. Times has a commentary this morning about the final demise of the independent record store, and it's the usual boomer lament for indie stores gone away, the good old days when you'd find a pristine copy of a rare throat singing album buried in the 99 cent pile. I remember those days, too, and I have my list of record stores in which I used to root around for treasures.
The article carries the subhed "Independent record stores still offer things the Internet can't," and goes on to describe what that is:
I am old-fashioned enough to want to get out of the house once in a while, into real three-dimensional spaces stocked with things you can see and smell and pick up and turn over to see what they look like on the other side.
Proust had his madeleine, but nothing unlocks the seven volumes of my memory so much as handling some LP I bought when I was 13 or 14 years old. There are those of us for whom music is a fetishistic activity, in the primary meaning of fetish: "an object that is believed to have magical or spiritual powers." Can one fetishize an MP3 file? I haven't been able to yet. (You can fetishize the player, as Apple accountants can attest, but that is a different thing.)
Er, so what we're losing is the ability for some aging hipster to get a woodie over touching a record?
Yep.
And what we're ALSO losing is the attitude. Remember when you wanted to buy a record that was totally unfashionable, and fearing the wrath of the grad-student-for-life behind the counter, the sneer directed at you, the need to mutter "it's for my cousin" or some other lame, forced explanation? Remmeber when ALL the clerks at every indie record store were variations of Jack Black in the movie version of "High Fidelity"? How you felt like judgement was being cast upon you from on high, even though the clerks were really losers who wielded their eclecticism like a weapon (the only one they owned) against the oppression of bourgeois American society (that would be you)? (And isn't it interesting that the same music that was anathema to those clerks is probably prized by the same people today, albeit in that annoying combination of forced-irony and I-liked-it-all-along revisionism that rock snobs always carry?)
All of that is gone now. Now, you can buy whatever you want whenever you want it. You can hear things first, get recommendations without the supercilious attitude, buy just one song if that's all you want. And you can do that without a) leaving home, and b) filling your living quarters with stacks and shelves and crates of albums and CDs. So you can't look at the cover, feel the vinyl, flip through the little lyric booklet. I miss some of that, but when it comes down to reason, the physical manifestation of music was a waste of space. We have crates and shelves packed with our old CDs and records, and it's really for nostalgia's sake; unlike books, which to date beat any electronic replication of the reading experience for portability and clarity, music might as well be offered without packaging. The packaging may be a separate art form, but one that's outlived its usefulness, just as a beautifully designed buggy whip doesn't mean we need to preserve the buggy whip or even lament its passing from daily use.
So I, too, have fond memories of independent record stores. I even enjoy the experience at L.A.'s branch of Amoeba Records, the mega-indie that's poised to be the last one standing. But we don't NEED independent record stores anymore, and there are more good reasons for them to go away than there are for them to stick around. I'll let the L.A. Times extend the funeral if it wants, but, really, it's time to get over it and move on.
(Although without records, we wouldn't have had this)
Share