NOT CRAZY IN LOVE
The Grammys were never all that interesting to me. I never liked the kind of bland mainstream pop that the awards were designed to celebrate, so there was never anything there for me. They're on right now; I'm not watching. (OK, I DID watch a few seconds of it- Outkast won best rap album or something, and I turned it off)
This year's awards are interesting to the public mostly for the will-anyone-do-anything-outrageous possibilities, although the Grammys never, ever have anything like that- the MTV awards shows are the ones for which the stars save their calculated outrageousness. No, the Grammys are all about blandness. Nothing dangerous at all. Never is.
The Grammys also reinforce something I'm not sure I need to remember- I just don't know too many of the top 40 songs these days. I don't think it's my fault, either. Back in the 60's and 70's, kids, there was something called Top 40 radio, and when they said Top 40 they MEANT Top 40, all of it. They played the Beatles and Dean Martin and Cream and James Brown and Sinatra and the Stones and Glen Campbell and whoever else was on the charts, back-to-back-to-back. They did this because FM was all beautiful music and classical and it was only in the late 60's that someone- Tom Donahue, by most accounts- decided to play rock 'n' roll and even album cuts on FM, but otherwise you had only top 40 to play pretty much every kind of music. And you'd listen to WABC or WFIL or KHJ- you would, because EVERYBODY, including your parents, your friends, everybody did- and you'd hear all of it. When FM took over and you suddenly could hear your favorite type of music without those songs you didn't like, you went there and never looked back.
So move it forward to today, where the top 40, judging by the charts, is made up of mostly hip-hop and teen pop. Nothing there for a suburban adult who doesn't want to hear about the thug life in Compton because he lives too damn close to the real thing and knows it isn't the stuff of entertainment. Nothing there for an adult male when a huge portion of the music's aimed at a tween female. Nothing there for someone who heard today's rock the first time around, 25 or 30 years ago, the same, for example, Led Zeppelin records Jack and Meg White undoubtedly heard and thought, hey, we can do that, too.
Which explains why I'm not bothering with the Grammys tonight.
Besides, nobody I'd WANT to see naked is likely to take her top off, so what's the point?
Share