« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 »

August 2006 Archives

August 1, 2006

F THIS S

Here's why I guess I'll never be a manager again:

A TV sports guy taped a report. He flubbed something, said "shit, let's retake that," and started from the top again. Then someone made a mistake and played the first segment and the comment.

Management fired him. Or, in management-speak, he "resigned" and they "accepted it."

Now, he did not push that button. Some techie played the wrong tape without checking it first. The sports guy did nothing wrong. Why force HIM to resign?

You may remember other situations like this.

TV and radio managers are panicked over minor slips. (And who has never used that word, anyway? KIDS use it.) This is what you get when pandering political hacks get to the FCC. That means you, Kevin Martin, Michael Copps, Jonathan Adelstein, and Debi Tate. (The new guy hasn't been there long enough to rip. Yet.) But when they show up to NAB conventions, do they get asked why they're willing to slap stations with heavy fines or even license revocation for the mere slip of a mild oath? Are the Congressmen and Senators who voted to crack down on "indecency" every asked if they really, truly think there's any harm from the kind of things they're ready and willing to ruin careers over? What do they think is gonna happen if anyone, including kids, happens to hear someone say "the s-word"? Instead, all the NAB does is ask why satellite doesn't get fined, too. Real courageous.

They, and the managers, are full of... some word. I give up, We're living in strange times.


  Share

August 2, 2006

T.O. BE, OR NOT T.O. BE

Here's Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie talking about something:

    "I would not do it again," Lurie said Wednesday in his annual state-of-the-team address. "You look back on it -- one year great, the second year a disaster. Nobody should be able to be as disruptive and really cut the energy of the team down.

    "I think we all learned from that."

Now, who could he possibly be talking about?

Honestly, that first year was an interesting ride, and except for the ultimate outcome, if you offered Eagles fans a trip to the Super Bowl before that season, there'd have been long queues of fans ready to sell their souls. You get one year out of the guy; in Dallas, they'll be thinking that maybe, just maybe things will be different with Parcells than it was with Mariucci or Reid.

Nah. But they'll probably have some fun this season, at least.

There is no shortage of teams willing to take a chance on guys with bad reputations, clubhouse cancers. It didn't take long for someone to pick up Shea Hillenbrand when the Blue Jays had had enough. The NBA is full of problem children, and some teams- the Jailblazers, anyone?- cultivate them in clusters. Eventually, things go bad, and with some guys like T.O., it gets REALLY bad, team-destroying bad. But fans and owners alike generally will accept a wife-beating anti-Semitic mass murderer if he'll get them to the Big Game.

There may be a future for Mel Gibson after all. Can he hit a slider?


  Share

August 3, 2006

THIS WEEK'S "TLE LETTER": WHY CAN'T WE BE FRIENDS?

This week's All Access newsletter is about how polarized talk radio's gotten. Enjoy:

I don't know exactly when the conventional wisdom changed to create all-conservative talk stations and all-liberal talk stations, but that's the way things are now, for the most part. Maybe it's a sign of the increasing polarization of American political discourse. Or maybe PDs just got tired of hearing complaints from one host's fans about the other host's show. It's kind of a shame, actually.

I was talking about this with a host who lands on the liberal end of the political spectrum who's worked at some conservative stations. And the reaction he got as a left-winger on a right-wing station was surprising: listeners mostly liked him, even when they disagreed with him. Of course, that's not the same as a focus group- it's probably more accurate. (Don't get me started on focus groups. Seriously, I could rant for hours) The listeners took it in stride.

And back when I was a kid and the nation's hosts cowered in fear of the dreaded Fairness Doctrine, you got liberals and conservatives and who-knows-what-else all on the same station, all the time. You'd put on, say, WMCA in New York and you'd hear the ranting conservative Bob Grant and the raging liberal John Sterling (yes, THAT John Sterling, the "Yankees win! Yankees win! Thuh-uh-uh-uh Yankees win!" John Sterling) on the same station, every day. I remember lots of hosts from stations like WMCA, WOR, WCAU, and WWDB, and what I remember is less their political stances than their styles, the entertainment value. And today. some of the best local hosts defy political pigeonholing- just when you think you have 'em pegged as conservatives, they say something you'd call liberal, or vice versa. They're unpredictable from day to day, from topic to topic. Some PDs would be appalled by that; I think it's a good thing.

I can't tell you, actually, whether you should really mix conservative and liberal political talk these days. Perhaps the polarized formats ARE a better idea. After all, you'd tune in WABC or KHJ or WFIL or any other Top 40 station of the 60's and 70's and you'd get the Beatles and Frank Sinatra and Glen Campbell and Marvin Gaye and Cream back-to-back and you can't do that anymore, because someone who wants rock can hear all-rock stations, someone who wants country can tune in the country station, and someone who wants Frank Sinatra can go buy a satellite radio. Talk's that way, too- you have the conservative station and the other conservative station and the liberal station and the sports station and maybe a weird brokered one that always seems to have fake talk shows about miracle dietary supplements. You don't need to sit through the "song" you don't like to get to the one you do. And I suppose it's better that way. But I kinda miss the days when there were hosts you loved and hosts you loved to hate, all on one station.

Maybe there's room for "Jack-AM: We Say What We Want." Just a thought.

But no matter what your political persuasion, you'll be sure to be appalled by the wide selection of show topics, story links, and irresponsible, uninformed commentary at the industry's leading show prep topic resource, by which I mean Talk Topics at All Access News-Talk-Sports. Why, this week so far, you'll find stories about a guy who ordered his Whopper in the buff (huh huh), the burning issue of letting dogs into restaurants, how to get a DUI without actually driving, why the erection (pun definitely intended) of some public art has a Chicago suburb upset, the surprising results of a survey about what people are really using their cell phones for, why patriotism and public nudity don't mix, a lawsuit over flaming rum shots, why "Miami Vice" isn't likely to do for tourism what the local officials thought it would, and something about some drunk actor who said something really stupid. Maybe you heard that one. You'll also get stories and links about "real news" like the Israel-Hezbollah war and the heat wave and baseball's second half, and "10 Questions With..." KFWB/Los Angeles sports anchor and "Dodger Talk" host (and KNBC TV sports anchor, and TVG host, and...) Bill Seward and the Talent Toolkit which, for the second consecutive year, takes advantage of the phrase "dog days of Summer" to provide resources for all things canine, and the rest of All Access with the industry's best/fastest/most reliable news coverage and columns and the Industry Directory and real airplay charts from Mediabase 24/7 and other stuff that's all good and all free. How do we do it? Volume!

Next week: No idea. It was hard enough coming up with this one. Couldn't you tell?


  Share

August 4, 2006

THANK YOU FOR IMMEDIATELY DISPROVING MY POINT. I'LL GO NOW

This week's "The Letter" got posted by someone on conservative site Free Republic.

Then someone mentioned it on Radio-Info.com, linking to the Freep link.

Then the thread degenerated into "Freep is racist"/"No, it isn't."

Can't we all just get along? No, apparently not.


  Share

August 5, 2006

MOTHER ISSUES AGAIN

Dunno what's up with me, but I'm about as lethargic as I've been in a while. Maybe I'm just plain tired. And that may be why I forgot yesterday to mention something I don't want to let pass.

On August 4, 1994, my mom, Phyllis Simon, passed away.

On August 5, 2006, I still miss her dearly.

I forgot last year. But I didn't forget on her birthday/Mother's Day this year, so in lieu of trying to write anything in my diminished state, you can see what I wrote about her here.

Funny, too, that it's when I'm most tired- like right now- that my accent occasionally shows traces of her eastern European accent, when "th"s come out "t"s. I tink I'll go trow on a DVD or someting and relax now.


  Share

August 6, 2006

AT THE MOVIES: A "SCOOP" OF SALAD DRESSING

The energy level was marginally better today. It's perhaps my body adjusting to my changed diet, or maybe I've been invaded by alien bacteria from the planet Slowass. Either way, at least I'm ambulatory. But I need some days off soon.

The latest trip to the multiplex as for "Scoop," the current Woody Allen stab at relevance. This one's a comedy, and despite the whooping of a couple of overly enthusiastic seniors in the audience who laughed even at stuff not intended to be humorous, it wasn't all that funny or original. An opening sequence with bunch of grizzled journalists at a pub toasting a dead colleague was straight out of "Broadway Danny Rose," death makes a Bergmanesque return visit, and it's all about a fairly lame "murder mystery," with Scarlett Johansson terribly miscast as a Jewish college student from Brooklyn trying to break into journalism by sleeping with her subjects. Woody's in it as a magician enlisted in helping her "crack the case," Ian Mcshane is the dead journalist makign cameo appearances to provide Scarlett with tips, Hugh Jackman's the heartthrob rich guy suspect, and it's all terribly average. Scarlett's dialogue makes her a Woody mouthpiese even when he's standing right there in the same scene, and, sadly, he can't write dialogue for anyone other than himself- it's all very stilted and weird. You can predict the ending without seeing the movie, so go ahead and do that.

But the worst part was the guy next to me EATING A SMELLY SALAD IN THE CROWDED THEATER:

I hate you, sir.


  Share

August 7, 2006

A FEW MORE OF "MY FAVORITES" THINGS, OR "LEAVE ME ALONE, I'M TIRED"

The energy level is creeping upwards, but only creeping. Still strangely worn out. Tonight will be a limited-motion evening; maybe I'll summon up enough energy to press the buttons on the remote.

While I'm being lazy, though, I'm gonna just put up a coupla YouTube things, like:

Alvin, Simon, and Theodore sell liquid soap in 1964:

A truly odd 1950's Kellogg's Corn Flakes commercial ("eaten and digested like lightning!") from the UK:


Charles Nelson Reilly in a banana suit, in front of a classroom filled with kids in similar banana suits, and nary a Department of Child Services worker in sight:

Enough.


  Share

August 8, 2006

OLD AND OUT OF THE WAY

Greg Maddux pitched tonight, so the press box was packed and there were a lot of walk-up tickets sold at game time. And he did okay, seven hits and two earned runs in six innings, hardly the no-hit six innings he threw in his previous start but not terrible. And the Dodgers picked him up with three late runs to win the game.

But the guy's 40, and it's pretty impressive for that age. I'm, well, 40-something, and I can't do what he does. (I couldn't do it at 30, either, or 20, or 15, but that's another story) When the talk in the press box turned to the recent media game played at the stadium, I realized, well, I can't do that, either. I can't do a whole lot of competitive athletic endeavors anymore. Two sore knees and two sore hips will do that to you.

I don't exactly miss playing basketball or baseball or running faster than a slow slog. What I miss is being ABLE to do that. It didn't bother me that I wasn't much good at any sport, as long as I felt capable of, say, running up and down a court and hitting a jumper without being too out of breath, or being able to leg out a base hit without looking like Grandpa when the bursitis started acting up. If I'd actually been good at any sport, this would be agony. As it is, I hate the idea that I'm not as spry as I used to be.

"Spry." That's a word you associate with the elderly. And if you're not elderly but not spry, what then? That's how I'm feeling lately- aching all over, limping, sore, not the same as I was even a year ago.

More power to Greg Maddux. Wish I could still, you know, DO stuff like that. Maybe 20 fewer pounds would help. We'll see, I hope.


  Share

August 9, 2006

DELUSIONS OF ADEQUACY

It took me all evening to finally squeeze out the All Access newsletter for this week, only two days late.

Got nothing left.

Will just point out that the Phillies have not looked better in ages since jettisoning Bell, Abreu, Lidle, Cormier, and Franklin. I'm not crazy enough to expect a wild card this year or, absent some deals and signings, anything much next year, but it really is more fun to watch this lineup, made up mostly of guys who try hard (and Burrell) than it was to watch the lineup they had for the last few seasons. And Utley's scoring from second on a front-of-the-plate one-hop chopper to the mound was as heads-up as it gets.

But I'm not crazy. And I'm a Phillies fan. So skepticism shall continue to rule the day. (Pretty amazin', though)


  Share

August 10, 2006

THIS WEEK'S "THE LETTER": GET A JOB

Odd that I just started reading this book and it just so happens that the news brings stark illustration of the book's topic.

Anyway, this week's "The Letter" newsletter for All Access is concerned with more mundanities, like getting a job (it was written before the news from London):

Lately, I've been getting a flood of calls and e-mails and letters from talk hosts looking for jobs. And I've been getting behind in corresponding with everyone as the stack of CDs and resumes gets taller on my desk and the e-mails keep coming, and I apologize to you all for my inability to catch up with the backlog, because I really do want to see everyone get gainful employment. But I know that the job market can seem impossible to navigate these days. What do you do to stand out? How do you get a job with companies cutting back and consolidating and with so much syndication out there?

Beats me.

No, actually, there ARE things you should do to increase your chances. One is to network. A lot of jobs go not to the person who sends a CD and resume but instead go to someone the PD or consultant already knows. Well, "know" is a relative term. "Is aware of" is probably more accurate. The PD probably has an idea of the kind of show he or she is looking for, but the chances of finding that in a stack of CDs are more remote than thinking about the people with whom you're familiar and deciding that, yeah, that guy at that station would be perfect for this slot. And that's why you need people to know who you are BEFORE there's a position open at their stations. Like in Hollywood and in other equally respected industries like prostitution and drug dealing, it's all about who you know. You can plug away and get great ratings and never move forward, because nobody knows about your story, or you can get phone and e-mail and in-person relationships going with key decision mak ers- PDs, consultants, the GM's golfing partner who tells him everything that's wrong with the station- and be one of those people about whom they say "hey, what about that guy? You know, the guy at that station. The one with the... you know, that guy." They might even remember your name, which means you're ahead of the game.

That's one way, and an important one. Another is to not give anyone any reason to hate your guts. I'm not going to go into detail here, but let's just say that if you've insulted, disrespected, or ignored someone in the past, don't expect them to be all that thrilled about helping you. That's all I'm saying. You know who you are. Some people have long memories.

What to put in your aircheck? The problem is that different PDs are looking for different things, but when I was a PD, scoped or unscoped didn't matter. What did matter was this: you have 30 seconds. If I don't hear something that will keep me listening in the very opening of the tape, you're gone. Harsh? What do you think listeners do when they tune in to your show? If there isn't something entertaining, compelling, interesting right away, it's off to another station. I can't tell you how many airchecks I heard over the years started with long, heavily produced intros instead of what I wanted to hear, THE SHOW. And production values aren't as important to me as content and style. One of the best hires I made was off a crudely "produced" cassette with two guys in a production studio in market number infinity doing a mock talk show- they'd never even worked together on the air, it was rough, but within the first seconds I heard what I was looking for. I got lots of s lickly produced tapes and agents' packages for that job, but I went for the one that got right to the point and entertained me from the very beginning. So that's what worked for me. But other PDs may be looking for something else, so take that for what it's worth (a guy who isn't hiring anyone telling you who he'd hire if he was making the decisions, which he isn't).

And be prepared to move. It's that kind of market out there.

What's the future for the business? Satellite, podcasting, WiMax? How will that impact your career? Let's save that for another week. I don't feel like scaring anyone right now. Instead, cheer up with the cavalcade of whimsy that is Talk Topics, the radio industry's biggest and most widely read show prep column, available exclusively at All Access News-Talk-Sports. This week so far? Stories about some celebrities arrested on a street named after them, a woman who woke up to find something on her body that hadn't been there before she fell asleep, a particularly unfortunate celebrity political endorsement, a couple of reasons not to travel to Italy, the actual scientific explanation for those Mentos-and-Diet Coke explosions, exactly how fat soda really makes you, a parade in New Zealand that'll put the Macy's parade to shame, the train wreck that is Maurice Clarett, a link to an entire article about the fabulous world of gum, a lawyer who couldn't resist passing the bar (rimshot!), someone who got fired by text message, the decline of civilization as measured by the popularity- or mere existence- of "Pants-Off Dance Off," and an article about weirdos- like me- who don't have air conditioning, plus "real news" links and commentary about the Middle East, the primary elections, and Paris Hilton proclaiming her celibacy. Add to that "10 Questions With..." "Family Matters Radio" producer and co-host and cool person Caroline Kruse, the Talent Toolkit with some good bookmarkable sources for Hollywood news and gossip, and the rest of All Access with the industry's fastest/most complete/ginchiest news coverage in Net News, message boards, columns, the incredible Industry Directory, and Mediabase 24/7 charts, all that music radio stuff, you know, and, well, it's all pretty amazing. And free. Free? No wonder the number of users has gone through the roof lately.

Next week: I (finally) take a few days off. Will that improve my coherence? We'll find out.


  Share

August 11, 2006

MIKE, WE ACTUALLY DID KNOW YE

Mike Douglas died this morning.

I watched Mike Douglas virtually every day as a kid. It's not that he was cool- he was resolutely not. It's not that he was exciting- he was resolutely not. It was... well, I'm not sure why. Maybe it was because it was relaxed, kinda corny, but low-stress, the same every day. Maybe it was the Philly thing, a little unrefined, definitely not Hollywood.

Maybe it was the guests. You know about things like the John and Yoko week, but usually you got David Brenner, Don Rickles, Totie Fields, your Vegas/Borscht Belt comics. I liked that, and getting rock bands was a bonus. It was like Top 40 radio of the day, with acts that didn't belong together sharing the stage. It was a low-rent Sullivan show. It was goofy stunts and huge-name guests and Mike singing a corny song, sometimes with the guest. I wish there was a show like it- Ellen DeGeneres is closest, but she's way too aware, if you know what I mean. You need a clueless middle-aged or older crooner who has no idea about the rock and the roll. Mike and Merv, that's what you need.

Never saw it? That's what YouTube's for. Clips galore, but mostly of the musical performance variety,

Here he is with Judy Garland in 1968- she had only a year left, and it shows:

And KISS, of all people:

Zappa?:

Freda Payne:

Shirley Bassey (check out the hairdos in this clip):

These clips don't do justice to the weirdness of the show, in which these stars would end up participating in a cooking segment or some stunt, the star looking bewildered, the host beaming inanely. It's not quite Joe Franklin-level weird- that deserves its own column- but it's the kind of honest-weird you don't see anymore. "The Mike Douglas Show" was weird without trying. We're all too jaded and cynical for this kind of entertainment, I guess, but it would be fun to see it again.


  Share

August 12, 2006

LEAVE ME ALONE

I'm actually off today- took a few days while my sister's in town to sleep late and not write the normal load. So that's what I'm doing.

Besides, it's Saturday night. Being at the computer right now is pretty sad, so I'm stopping now. Shouldn't you?


  Share

August 13, 2006

AN UNPLEASANT FLAVOR

We watched that episode of Flavor Flav's show last night. You know the one. The one with this:

And, thus, I am scarred for life, not only for the epic badness of the show but for having watched some loud, large reality show contestant take a dump on the floor of Flavor Flav's living room and stairs. That's the last time I watch a reality show.


  Share

August 14, 2006

HOW I SPENT MY SUMMER VACATION

Saturday was "Flavor of Love" night.

Sunday?

"Pants Off Dance Off."

Appalling.

Any resemblance of my life to Ignatius J. Reilly's is purely coincidental.

I just don't have the hang of this "time off" thing yet.


  Share

August 15, 2006

THE WILD LIFE

Ladies and gentlemen, here it is, the World Premiere of next year's Sundance smash, part nature documentary and part erotic love story, the Palos Verdes Raccoons in their big screen debut, "Drinkin', Kissin', Huggin'," directed by Ella the World's Most Famous Cat.

(Shot entirely on location in my backyard, in JiggleVision (R) and PublicDomain Digital Sound)


  Share

August 16, 2006

RELAX? DON'T DO IT.

The "vacation" is over. It feels like it never started. I kinda worked every day anyway, and that's my fault. Nobody MADE me work. Joel and everyone at All Access were great- I could have just walked away from the computer. But there's something wrong with me that forces me to feel guilty about leaving my readers in the lurch without stuff to talk about on the radio. So I worked.

And when I wasn't working, I tried to catch up on some reading and took a drive up to Pasadena with my visiting sister and tried to just take it easy, and I'm hopeless at that, too. There's a certain amount of nervous tension that just runs through me. I can't just, you know, SIT there. I can't just even sit on the couch and watch TV- I have to read and do a puzzle and check my e-mail and carry on a conversation while Flavor Flav is on the tube asking what that smell is. And since I don't really drink much- it would take a lot more beer than I'm willing to drink, especially while watching my caloric intake, to relax me- there's not a whole lot I can do about this.

And now, it's over. I've already hammered out a column, a 10 Questions column, "The Letter," and now this, all today, all in my final day of "vacation." How this differs from tomorrow, which is an official work day, I don't know. And Ella the World's Most Famous Cat made sure I woke up at the usual unGodly hour every day of this "vacation," so I'm downright tired.

I need a vacation. I'll always need a vacation. I'll never really have one. It's all my fault. Accepting that I'm powerless over my workaholism is the first step, right?


  Share

August 17, 2006

THIS WEEK'S "THE LETTER": THE FUTURE'S SO BRIGHT, UNLESS YOU WANT TO ACTUALLY MAKE ENOUGH MONEY TO EAT SOMETHING OTHER THAN STORE-BRAND CAT FOOD

The All Access newsletter this week continues the theme of career opportunities, and/or lack thereof:

As promised (I think), here's part two of Your Career In Talk Radio, or Why Your Mom Was Right About Getting A Real Job:

These (Monday through Wednesday) were supposed to be my "vacation" days, but I can't help myself, so I've been updating Talk Topics and the columns and even some Net News items regardless of the fact that I'm supposed to be relaxing and staying away from the computer and just enjoying some well-deserved idleness for a few short days. My mind is always in work mode. Can't turn it off.

And maybe that comes from my years in radio, where "vacation" means "opportunity for your boss to replace you." Personally, I never got the ax upon returning from vacation- they usually got tired of waiting for me to TAKE a vacation and just canned me when Bigger Name Program Director suddenly became available. And I never pulled that on any of my staff- I could never get used to the whole "no, that's okay, your shift is covered. Why don't you come with me to my office where I'll tell you about our future plans in which you play no part" thing. I'm no good at executions.

But while I've been trying to not think about the business, I've been, naturally, thinking about the business, and where it's going, especially after last week's Letter and the number of hosts who are out there looking for jobs. I think we all know that what's coming down the road is, um, a lot of "radio": satellite, Internet, WiMax, podcasts. The model of having a local station broadcasting from an antenna to your car radio may not go away, but it'll be joined by other options. You know about satellite, and you know that when it becomes feasible to deliver streaming Internet audio to car radios, all bets are off.

What does this mean to your career? When anyone can have a "radio station," when there's an unlimited number of choices, when anyone anywhere will be able to put a show on the air, what then? What jobs will there be? How will you make a living?

I don't know. I still don't know.

I don't know how anyone will be able to make money when there's an infinite number of stations dividing up a finite audience. I don't know how a podcast/time-shifting model will make money when it's so easy to fast-forward through commercials (live spots? How many live spots that sound like program content can you cram into an hour?). I don't know how this is all going to play out.

I DO know that it isn't happening yet.

Oh, sure, satellite is here, and podcasting, and streaming, but so far regular old terrestrial broadcast radio is still alive. The vast majority of people use "regular radio." The critical mass of listeners are still with "regular radio." And it'll take years and years before even a majority of cars have satellite and even longer before they have Internet streaming. I think things are gonna change, and the changes will offer a lot of opportunity for creative people to do creative entertainment and information. But we're only part-way there. Most of the alternatives to terrestrial broadcast radio will take a while before they can pay you enough to cover your rent and food.

So, back to career opportunities, just like last week. If you're an aspiring talk show host, or a talker looking for a better opportunity, what should you do?

You could try a podcast. It won't make you any money. Not yet, anyway. Maybe in several years when the advertisers are there, but not at the moment. You can use them as airchecks, and as creative outlets, and as a promotional tool, but it won't pay the bills.

You could try streaming - same thing. The financial structure isn't there yet. Might as well just podcast and save the money you'd spend on bandwidth.

You could keep applying to terrestrial radio, sending off CDs and MP3s and networking like crazy. That's probably your best bet right now. Maybe Wall Street thinks it's an industry in trouble, maybe your average 16 year old just doesn't listen to radio at all, maybe it's lost any glamour it once had, but, you know, of all the options right at this very minute, it's still the best chance for you to make a living doing this, and it's where most of the listeners are.

Or you could just sign for lots of money with satellite or a network, and... what? You're not a celebrity thinking that dabbling in radio "might be fun"? Oh. Forget I said anything.

No matter which route you take, however, you'll need material. Lucky for you there's All Access News-Talk-Sports and the Talk Topics show prep column, where despite my "vacation" I've been adding topics all week long, including stories about two-headed snakes (not on a plane), the angriest city in America (and it's not Philadelphia!), how the increased security at airports didn't prevent a kid from boarding a plane without a ticket or a woman from a) bringing hand cream on board or b) going nuts, a guy who's been arrested a lot (and that's an understatement), the end of Mr. KentuckyFriedCruelty.com, another study claiming coffee is actually good for you, a politician in hot water for using an alleged racial slur that's probably new to everyone, the return of Pac-Man, exploding laptops, all sorts of government-sanctioned traffic problems, and the truth behind those "push to cross street" buttons AND wine ratings (separate stories), plus links and comments about the ceasefire, terror, airport security, and Paris Hilton, "10 Questions With..." syndicated "Family Matters Radio" co-host and (equally to her co-host) cool person Jacquie Chakirelis, the Talent Toolkit with resorces to tell you exactly what you can and can't carry onto airplanes, and the rest of All Access with news and columns and message boards and the Industry Directory and it's all free and I do believe I've just broken the all-time record for longest sentence ever.

And now it's back to work. I'm not sure how I'll be able to tell the difference between my days off and work days, but I'm back. Order has been restored. And we now have absolute proof that taking time off doesn't improve my ability to communicate.


  Share

August 18, 2006

FRIDAY OUT OF MY MIND

Weird- the days off only succeeded in throwing everything off-balance. Even just two days of full workload have me exhausted and thankful I made it to the end of the week. Perhaps it's that change in diet, perhaps I'm sick, but, man, I'm yawning up a storm and my mind is shutting down.

That sounds like a perfect Friday evening to me. Sorry for the abbreviated post- time to go do nothing.


  Share

August 19, 2006

L'CHIAM!

I've finally found something I'd want to go to less than my high school reunion.

Would you believe there's such a thing as a bar mitzvah reunion?

Somehow, the temple where I had my bar mitzvah found my address and sent me a cheerful Print Shop Pro clip-art flyer for its "Jubilee Celibration"- it's 50 years old this year- and an invitation to the big B'nai Mitzvah Reunion. They're looking for all the folks who have had their ceremonies there to come back for a big service and reunion. This might be more attractive if a) I remembered anyone who had a bar/bat mitzvah there, or b) if I even remembered my OWN. But, alas, I don't remember anything about the thing. There'll also be a Jubilee Celebration gala dinner dance ("entertainment by Jeffrey Craig/Pure Energy"!) ($125. per person) the next night and something called a "Beged Kefet Concert" on Sunday which, judging from the picture, involves a bearded gent with a bongo and someone else with a tambouring, among others.

Um, yeah, well, see, I'll be busy that weekend. And almost 3,000 miles away.

They also have a flyer in case I want to buy an ad in the "50th Jubilee Anniversary Ad Journal." $550. for a full page- I'm tempted. But I'm guessing they don't take ads with obscenities, so I'll probably save the money for something else.

I'm glad, really, that the folks at the temple are still active and that folks are jazzed about stuff like B'nai Mitzvah reunions. Maybe it's my bad that I wouldn't go to something like that even at gunpoint. But I don't want to put a damper on anyone else's fun. May the temple enjoy many more Jubilees. They'll just be doing that without me.


  Share

August 20, 2006

MOVIE FOR A SUNDAY AFTERNOON

Saw "Little Miss Sunshine" today and it was OK, not the world-beating Best Picture Of the Century like some critics and Sundance casualties would have you believe but amusing in a "let's make fun of the dysfunctional losers" way that culminates in an "aww, the dysfunctional family sort of triumphs" finale. Not horrible, not great, mildly diverting, worth a cheap matinee or DVD rental.

But what made this movie better was that despite a crowded theater, there was precious little misbehavior. No eating smelly salads, no talking through the movie, no cell phones, nobody sitting right next to us despite seats being available elsewhere, no bother. Just the movie, nothing else. No aggravation.

I could get used to that.


  Share

August 21, 2006

TIME WASTERS OF 1965

No time tonight. So...

When I was five years old, I thought this was screamingly funny.

Again, I was five years old. Five. You can't blame me.

I would likely have seen this when it aired the first time, too:

But I was 4 at the time. Four. And I would not have been screaming, not for the Dave Clark Five, at least.

I'd have watched this, too, and it would not have seemed odd to me that the singer and others were flailing in a most unfortunate manner:

I may have seen this, too, but I can't honestly recall it:

It's amazing to see a) Koufax dominating the Twins, and b) the way baseball on TV used to be- no obtrusive graphics and announcers who didn't yammer on and on and on and on and on. (We're lucky here to still get the latter- thank you, Vin Scully. And, yes, Vin is heard on this one)

It was a very good year. I didn't know from cancer, or war, or mortgages or taxes or anything else. All I knew was that I had a safe place to live, a family that loved me, and a TV that worked and brought me Soupy Sales and "Shindig" and Sandy Becker and "Hullabaloo" and "The Flintstones." That was good enough for me, even if the TV was black and white, only got a few channels, and took forever to "warm up."


  Share

August 22, 2006

ANOTHER BAD MOOD

It's not that I have nothing to say, it's that it's August, it's been a long day, I've been writing nonstop for hours, and I just don't really feel like writing it right now.

So here's a blog about old shopping malls.

And a great, if haphazardly organized, page on discount stores of the sixties is here.

And here's a clip from 1964:

I remember this version. No Brett Somers or Charles Nelson Reilly or that microphone, but the same old game. And an unforgettable Bert Kaempfert theme.

Perhaps I'll be more inspired by the time I have to write the weekly newsletter. Or not.


  Share

August 23, 2006

LAZY RADIO

Here's something minor that drives me crazy about radio people: they sometimes just take stories directly off the web or some Fark-like "wacky story" service and don't actually pay any attention to things like, say, important details.

Example: the story I had on All Access about the editing of Tom and Jerry cartoons to eliminate smoking. When I wrote it up, I noted that it was the BRITISH version of Boomerang doing the cutting- it was at the behest of UK broadcasting regulator OFCOM after a complaint. Then I heard it on several radio shows, and NONE of them mentioned that it WASN'T being done in the U.S.

READ THE DAMN STORY! And if you're just relying on a prep service that doesn't itself read the stories, you owe it to your own credibility to do your own writing, and use a prep resource that you know actually reads all the stories before writing about them. One like, oh, I don't know, how about All Access? There's my self-serving thought for today.


  Share

August 24, 2006

THIS WEEK'S "THE LETTER": CHANGE IS GOOD. SOMETIMES.

This week's All Access newsletter addressed the recent news-making format changes at KZLA/Los Angeles and WSNI/Philadelphia, with the overall theme of Maybe It Was The Right Thing To Do, Or Not, But Get Over It:

Get ready (get ready)... for the NEW (the new)... M-M-M-MOVIN' LETTER!

It's the Letter that MAKES YOU MOVE (you move)... the NEW (the new)... M-M-M-MOVIN' LETTER!

LET'S GET IT STARTED! LET'S GET IT STARTED IN HERE!
LET'S GET IT STARTED! LET'S GET IT STARTED IN HERE!
LET'S GET IT...

(The "Old-Format Letter" will continue to be available in HD-E-Mail)

Okay, so I'm not changing format. It was just a stunt. Ha ha! A little radio humor there! Now back to more of Today's Best Commentary in The All-New Letter!

Yeah, those format changes are pretty predictable. So is the reaction. Every time an abrupt format change comes up, the same things happen: suddenly, listeners come out of the woodwork claiming to be loyal to the the old 1-share format, and "experts"- usually the same handful of trade reporters and consultants- run to the newspapers to proclaim the ultimate doom of the new format. Hey, they have a 50-50 chance of being right.

I went through this a few times. Once, we replaced a short-lived oldies format with a weird revolutionary local talk and oldies hybrid, and all I heard for a few months is "what are you THINKING?" and "when are you going to go back to music? FM is for music." And then the ratings came out and shortly thereafter people came out of the woodwork to take credit for it. Later, we replaced a shrinking classic rock format with talk and all I heard was "what are you THINKING?" and "when are you going to go back to music? FM is for music." It was only after the revenues started to cascade in that some of the same people who pronounced the whole thing a failure after the first ratings book started to take credit for inventing the format.

And that's why I tend to give the guys who make the changes the benefit of the doubt. I don't always agree with the changes and I don't always agree with the implementation- it's the armchair quarterback thing, or "why, in my day, we would have done it THIS way..." attitude- but I'll give it time. (Okay, I made fun of "Jack," but only because it's fun to do rude imitations of those Howard Cogan liners and the initial Phil Collins fetish)

I'm just disappointed that none of the latest changes involve starting new talk stations. The L.A. and Philly changes do address holes in the markets and demographic changes there, but as I've written here before, I still think that more talk on terrestrial FM is the way to go, because unlike music, you can't duplicate good local talk hosts, and if you want to reach younger audiences, you gotta go where they are- FM. It's only a matter of time before more companies realize that there's room for more of this. I hope.

I do, on the other hand, feel for the people who lost their jobs with the changes. Any changes will cause some good people to hit the unemployment line- I wish them luck and suggest that All Access is a great resource to find that next gig. And for the listeners disappointed by the loss of "their stations," I feel for them, too, but they also should remember that "I love that music" does not necessarily mean "everyone else loves that music," and "everybody I know listened" doesn't mean "everyone listened." Suggesting satellite for, say, an L.A. country fan might sound callous- you're telling someone that they should pay $13. to hear what used to be free- but people really into blues, reggae, jazz, folk, standards, and many other formats are in that boat, too. At least it's an option, one that wasn't available a few years ago. Same for Internet streaming. And there's always your iPod.

(Really, though, is it too early to ask Santa for more talk stations? Maybe Philly needed "Rumba 104.5," but how about more talk? Why, yes, it's self-serving. Why do you ask?)

One thing that hasn't changed (Hah! See what I did there? Right into the sales pitch!) is the Talk Topics column at All Access News-Talk-Sports. More precisely, it still serves up more useable talk and morning radio show topics than any other source, lovingly hand-picked and prepared fresh several times daily. So far this week, for example, you'll find items and links and comments about stories like the campaign to rid hotel TVs of the lonely traveling salesman's only solace, how not to defend yourself against a DUI, a guy whose huge belly turned out to be carrying his MUTANT TWIN!!!!, psycho killer raccoons (with a link to my very own major raccoon-oriented motion picture), why a bunch of teens are wandering around one town in the buff, snakes in a theater, snakes on toast, bees on a plane, a guy who allegedly bit a kid, er, um, in a bad place (they're all bad places, but it's the worst place, it's safe to say), what's on the mind of the Adults 100+ demographic, an ode t o Chet Kincaid, and more than one reference to Hitler, plus a horrifying cameo from Kevin Federline and "real news" items about the ceasefire and that guy who says he killed Jon-Benet and the annual cicada invasion. All that and more, like "10 Questions With..." KELO/Sioux Falls PD/host Greg Belfrage and the rest of All Access with Net News- fast, complete, accurate industry coverage- and message boards and columns and Mediabase charts and the Industry Directory and lots more, and it's free. Really. Nothing "locked away" for "premium" subscribers. You're all premium subscribers here, for free. Our gift to you. What's ours is yours. Within reason, of course.

Next week: something written in haste while I daydream about getting a whole two-day weekend for Labor Day. I take what I can get. Maybe I can use the time to finally answer the backlog of e-mails and letters I've been meaning to get to. Sorry and thanks for your patience.


  Share

August 25, 2006

ON THE SET, IN A MANNER OF SPEAKING: "PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN 3"

Running along PV Drive today minding my own business, I noticed helicopters, someone or something on a parachute, and a general commotion in the ocean. What could it be?

Could it be... why, yes, it IS the Black Pearl!

They're shooting more scenes for the third "Pirates of the Caribbean" movie in the ocean a couple of blocks from pmsimon.com World Headquarters, and all I had with me is my lousy Treo 600 0.3 MP phone camera. Well, to the naked eye it looked a LOT closer- you could easily make out all the sails and see about a dozen boats and two helicopters in the vicinity. But all I can do is zoom in a little on GrainyVision here and you can barely make out the ship:

I wasn't the only person watching, though. Cars and minivans and trucks appeared out of nowhere and filled the little fishing access parking lot on the other side of the old Marineland lot, with families all gawking from the cliffs:

Can't blame 'em this time. It was pretty damn cool to see the ship in person. No sign of the Deppster, though. Or Keira, or Orlando, or even Mackenzie Crook or Jack Davenport. Just a ship, some choppers, and lots of boats with cameras. Even in jaded L.A., that's enough to draw a crowd.


  Share

August 26, 2006

KILL YOUR OWN TELEVISION. I STILL HAVE MINE

It's a standard fallback column lazy newspaper columnists write when they need to fill space and wish to look smart and progressive to the latte-sippers in the readership, and a local columnist wrote one again today, another navel-gazer about going cold turkey and turning off the TV:

    The television and radio have been turned off in our home and my car for a month now. Coincidentally, during that time, I have not been afraid.

That's the opening sentence. Do you really need to read the rest? No, but if you do, you discover that she's found an alternative:

    But I mostly listened to the radio. Interestingly enough, I began to correlate my anxiety to what I was listening to and watched it decrease during the discussion of spiritual truth.

    Though I spent most of my radio time listening to wonderful shows such as "This American Life" and L.A. Theatre Works' radio theater, I often listened to the BBC and National Public Radio news. I found the reporting deeper and the coverage at a much higher quality level.

Of course. NPR and more NPR. She's so enlightened and special. The baristas at Starbucks will be tres impressed. And if that's not enough to bring a tear to your eye, she ends with this:

    During those hours frozen to the television, I discovered that the story of my life has been about my attempts to postpone now. I attempted to do that with activity, radio, paralysis and particularly, television. I did it because I was afraid of what now would contain, that it would not be good enough and that it should be different and so on.

    So, I tried to make now stop. Because now, the only thing that ever is, is impossible to stop, I ended up merely distracting myself. In doing so, I missed the joy of being.

    Life is a process of awakening. Until a certain level of awakening in me had already taken place, the television and radio had to be blasting. I understand that and am simply grateful for the shift.

    It's amazing how beautifully long a day is when one is in it.

Which is another way of saying

    Oh, I've been to Georgia and California and anywhere I could run
    I took the hand of a preacher man and we made love in the sun
    But I ran out of places and friendly faces because I had to be free
    I've been to paradise but I've never been to me

And they paid her for it.

Watching television doesn't prevent you from being, er, you. It's not a manifestation of a deep emptiness. It's entertainment, nothing more and nothing less. But if you feel the need to apologize for watching television- the need to put it in writing and publish it in the local paper- well, that might signify something more troublesome and deep-seated, the need for approval, the need to appear learned, the need for people to know that, no, you're no addict, you're no robotic stooge mindlessly watching network crapola- no, even when you deigned to watch TV you watched quality TV:

    Two years ago, I stopped watching the news completely. About the same time, I limited my watching to HBO, Showtime, IFC and the Sundance Channel. Still, I turned the television on whenever things got quiet, I felt lonely, or I was bored.

    I surmised that "Sex and the City" and "The Sopranos" were more artistic than "American Idol" and felt appropriately superior. Jay learned never to approach the bedroom between 8 and 10 p.m. Sunday nights.

See? She only watched the "more artistic" channels, not that Fox stuff for the masses. She's elite, you see.

I can't stand people like this. I can't stand people who not only need their personal habits to reflect a perceived superiority but who need to make sure each and every person he or she comes into contact with knows that. "Oh, I never watch television," you say? I have nothing to say to you, and that's not because I want to discuss "Deal or No Deal" with you.

See, I watch TV. I don't like everything on it, and some of it is indefensible, but it turns out that there's nothing wrong with wanting to be entertained. I do live "in the day," and I like to relax and watch something that isn't Charlie Rose interviewing a professor from NYU. I like to listen to the radio, and I like everything BUT NPR- turns out I like to stay awake while driving. I will not apologize for liking baseball, "Green Acres" reruns, "shock radio," talk radio, or "House." I will not apologize for avoiding PBS like the plague. I have a full life. I can handle a little down time. And I can handle the disdain of the "superior."

Now, if you'll excuse me, it turns out that channel 30 has a "Green Acres" marathon starting at 5. It's amazing how beautifully long a day is when one is watching Arnold Ziffel.


  Share

August 27, 2006

LEFT IT ON THE FIELD

It's Sunday, I worked all day, so for a useless day, here's a useless clip of the grounds crew grooming the field at Rogers Centre during a Blue Jays game, with the "Bonanza" theme on the organ as accompaniment:

Useless. I warned you.


  Share

August 28, 2006

THEY MAKE IT LOOK SO EASY ON HGTV

Let's see, now, the water heater needs to be replaced, the sprinkler system's on the fritz, we're replacing two sinks and having to repair a third, I found a loose floorboard in the living room, the screen on the back door keeps falling out... sometimes, I really long for the days when I could just call a landlord and have it taken care of without my further input.

Of course, there IS the matter of equity, which would be an even bigger issue if I had any intention of selling this place, which I don't.

Yeah, I needed more aggravation in my life. Good thing I'm SO DAMN WELL ADJUSTED. $#%@!

I'm not much in the mood to discuss this further, not after my attempt to diagnose the sprinkler problem resulted in a valve spewing water high into the air and all over me while I frantically tried to close it with a screwdriver. Time to call more experts in. I haven't totally given up yet, but I'm close to it. ANd they don't sell Xanax at Home Depot.


  Share

August 29, 2006

THE CURSE OF POTSIE

Anson Williams is going to appear on a friend's radio show later this week, and it reminded me of my brief against the Man Who Was Warren "Potsie Weber. To wit:

1. At some point, someone thought Anson Williams could sing. He could not.
2. Yet, on several episodes of "Happy Days," Anson Williams was allowed to sing.
3. On said episodes, people reacted as if Anson Williams was a good singer.
4. Somewhere two or three seasons into the series, when the show was supposed to be set in about 1960, Anson Williams' hair was styled in the manner of the late 1970s. Nobody remarked on this, nor was his ass kicked by someone sporting either a D.A. or a crew cut.
5. Potsie's behavior appeared to be that of a retarded person, yet he was "mainstreamed" in the same classes as Richie and Ralph.
6. In an episode set in college, Potsie displayed a learning disability, but was able to remember his instruction by singing it. Again, the reaction among the cast was of joy rather than horror.
7. "Potsie"? Was this an indicator of his choice of recreational herb?
8. After Richie and Ralph went off to the military, Potsie stayed behind with an increasingly elderly Fonz and Ted McGinley. Potsie was clearly classified 4-F. This was not surprising.
9. Unable to land a job in his chosen academic field- psychology!- Potsie ended up working for Howard Cunningham at the hardware store.
10. The guy who played "Sticks" apparently ended up in porn. Doesn't mean anything about Potsie, but there you go.

Bottom line: beware Potsie.

And Ralph Malph wasn't much of a bargain, either.


  Share

August 30, 2006

THIS WEEK'S "THE LETTER": GOTTA SERVE SOMEBODY

This week's "The Letter" All Access newsletter talks about some stuff mostly of interest to talk show hosts in particular, but the heart of the thing is this: some people won't ever be happy with what you do unless you do only exactly what they want to hear. Those are the core listeners, also known in the industry by the terrible jargon code "P1s." A lot of program directors think that the way to success is to give those folks what they want, but in some cases- liberal talk comes to mind- giving them what they want by its very nature will send other, less committed folks packing. I hear this all the time- the core wants nothing but "Bush is evil/Bushitler/Karl Rove is evil/Bushitler/Cheney is evil" talk, and that doesn't wear well with the larger group of available listeners who might not like the President much but don't obsess over him or Rove or Cheney or Iraq. Give the "P1s" what they want and you lose a lot more people than you keep. And where are the P1s gonna go if you aren't Bush-bashing?

But what do I know? I'm just an ex-Program Director:

How do you decide what to talk about on the air?

I don't mean specifically what you talk about on a particular day. I mean, how do you decide the general topic range for your show? What's in your wheelhouse, so to speak? How do you decide that you're a strictly hard-politics show, or a lifestyle show, or a sex-n-beer-n-sports show? For a lot of you, that decision has been made for you- your station has a demo target, you were hired to reach those folks, end of story.

But that's NOT the end of the story, because even if you know that you're trying to reach a particular demographic- say, 43 year old left-handed Republicans between 5'8" and 6'2"- the task then becomes determining what those 43 year old left-handed Republicans between 5'8" and 6'2" want to hear. And this, folks, is where you can get in trouble. Let's go over some of the ways you might determine what your audience wants to hear:

1. Research: There's some good research out there, yes, but there's a lot of bad research out there, too. I have a particular problem with focus groups, which are panels of people in your ostensible target demo assembled by an expert to tell you precisely what the moderator thinks you want to hear, or, more importantly, what your General Manager wants to hear, because that's who probably ordered the thing in the first place. (This is how you can tell a format change is coming: the focus group suddenly starts talking about how great the station would be if it "had more of the best variety of the 80s, 90s, and today" and, shortly thereafter, the GM asks if you were planning to take some vacation days anytime soon) But if you can get your station to spring for statistically valid research of topics and community concerns, go for it. GMs may not want to spend the money on research for talk radio, but if they spend the money on auditorium tests and callout for music, why shouldn't they support their talk stations, too?

2. Volume Of Calls: No, no, no, no, no. Want lots of calls? Just open the mike, say "abortion!" or "gun control!" or "Terrell Owens!" and you'll get calls aplenty, especially from special interest groups who listen for any mention of their pet topic and spread the word for their compatriots to flood the lines. (Okay, I'm not aware of organized callers for or against T.O., but definitely for and against abortion and gun control) Actual, regular listeners, the kind likely to get ratings diaries, will tune away. The goal is to get GOOD calls.

3. Keeping Your "Ear To The Ground": Time was that you'd find out what your listeners wanted by going out to where they are- bars, malls, grocery stores- and talking to people. Now, you can use the Internet to see what's hot, hip, an' happenin'. Some sites make it easier by ranking "most e-mailed" stories, and you can go to one of the sites that rank popular stories and stuff blogs are blogging about. Although perhaps you should ask yourself whether the folks who spend enough time on the Net to post messages on boards and pass around stories are really representative of the kind of folks who listen. (And this reminds me: a LOT of people I talk to in this business get caught up in what gets posted about radio on various radio message boards, including the ones on All Access and some others. If you get aggravated by what you see there, or if you find yourself getting paranoid when someone posts rumors about you or suggests you should/might be fired, stop reading them. It's probably some board op or someone you fired years ago, anyway. Remember: they're fine for entertainment purposes. If you take them more seriously, you get the blood pressure you deserve) And speaking as a blogger (gratuitous plug: pmsimon.com), there's no practical way to tell whether a topic that has bloggers buzzing also has others- your listeners- buzzing, too. I suggest you go to the bars, malls, and grocery stores and observe- you'll get a better read on who your listeners are and what they really care about. Use the Net, use personal observation, use them together.

4. Listening To The "P1s": Keeping in mind how much I hate jargon like "P1s," let's look at the core audience for a second. I know some good PDs who preach the gospel of superserving the P1s, and that's fine, except that it can get you into deep trouble. For some stations' P1s, there's nothing you can do to make them happy except to talk incessantly about their pet topics, which could in turn blow off the larger potential casual audience. While you're making the P1s happy, you're sending everyone else running. In that case, you'd better have millions of P1s.

And then there's the method I like the best, which is this: get a life. Go out and do what your listeners do. The best way to gauge what your listeners are thinking- what they're interested in talking about- is to do the kind of stuff they do. Take the kids to after-school activities. Go to the post office. Try to get help at the Home Depot. Shop for groceries, call the cable company for service, apply for a mortgage refinance. Do all of that, and think about where your mind was when you were just getting through each day. When you think about topics, use that filter. Ask yourself this: if I'm doing what my listeners are doing every day, would I care about this topic? Would I be entertained? Do that, and someday you'll be so successful and rich that you'll be able to live on an exclusive oceanfront estate with a limo and private jet and people whose job it is to do all those annoying daily chores for you. And you can ask your people what your listeners are thinking. You'll be far too wealthy and important to do it yourself.

But while you're still you, and you don't have "people" to think for you, you'll want some help coming up with topics, and where better to find them than Talk Topics at All Access News-Talk-Sports? This week, it's the End of Summer edition and Everything Must Go with stories about the ten things to do before the Summer's over, why some sunscreen may actually be worse than none at all, a thrilling tale of workplace revenge gone horribly wrong, a hotel with few amenities but maybe the best view ever, why the British government is bugging garbage cans, an amazing development in food science: frozen pizza with pop-up timers, why to take the latest "Americans are getting fat" story with a grain of salt, why your basic blue corner mailbox may be a thing of the past, the confluence of stem cells and soccer, why you probably don't want to be text messaging while operating a moving car (especially when a cop happens to be in front of you), and the saga of "Lil Dirty" and the prison sink, plus "real news" items and the usual stupid jokes and comments designed to help you get your show on, as well as the rest of All Access with the industry's undisputed first/best/fastest news source, Net News, and the Industry Directory and Mediabase charts and all sorts of other resources that would be well worth paying for if you had to, but they're all free. Really.

Hey, there's a long weekend coming up! For me, a long weekend is a day and a half, and I intend to take full advantage of it, assuming that the plumbers are finished replacing the bathroom sinks and fixing another sink and replacing the leaky water heater. No, I don't have that exclusive oceanfront estate with a limo and private jet and people whose job it is to do all those annoying daily chores for me. I'm on my own. I like to think of it as "show research."


  Share

August 31, 2006

SHOPPING FROM H TO D

Went to the store to look at HDTVs tonight. We have an HD set in the bedroom, but we're looking at getting a plasma for the living room, and there are some good sales this weekend, so we went to the local Best Buy and Magnolia stores.

It's a few years into the HD era, and Best Buy still displays its HD sets in the crappiest manner possible. None of the sets are properly calibrated, and the loop playing on the sets looks like hell on most of them. Many of the plasma sets had the dreaded "clay face"- you'd know what that is if you see it- and, really, none of the sets looked any good. Plus, you can't ask them to show something else- it's the loop or nothing.

Then you go to Magnolia, and the place has the sets showing actual HD content from DirecTV. Ask them to show you what standard def programming looks like and they flip the channel. Ask to see different material and they show you what various channels look like, pointing out the differences (720p vs. 1080i, lousy source material vs. native 1080i HD), being upfront with the drawbacks and positives of each model, going into the service menu to change settings to show off the best picture possible.

If Magnolia's freestanding store can do this- and, incidentally, charge about the same, give or take a hundred bucks- why can't Best Buy? Because, perhaps, the people in the blue shirts don't know and don't care? Because the Best Buy guys don't know anything about the models they're selling? Because the people who buy at Best Buy wouldn't know the difference anyway, and aren't even likely to notice whether they're watching HD or just a big purty picture? (And there's a small Magnolia unit in Best Buy- you'd think they'd rub off on the blue shirts)

Dunno if we're buying this weekend, but if we do, we can get a great deal at Best Buy. I think we're more likely to buy from Magnolia, where the selling is low key and way more honest. We may be alone on this- the Magnolia store was empty and dead quiet while Best Buy was hopping and noisy- but I have to think that if more people realized you can get treated better, pay about the same price, and end up with a better, educated, informed choice by going to another store, they would. Or maybe we're doomed to get lousy treatment from blue shirts who don't care, because we accept that without complaint. I'll let you know what we do.


  Share

About August 2006

This page contains all entries posted to PMSimon.com in August 2006. They are listed from oldest to newest.

July 2006 is the previous archive.

September 2006 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.