The newsletter I send out to All Access subscribers every Tuesday went out again today, and this time I got a ton of response. So here's the relevant portion, and remember that we're talking tongue-in-cheek here (there ARE exceptions, and to all the Syracuse fans who flooded my e-mail inbox, yes, townies can get special dispensation, especially if there are no local pro teams and not much else to do in town):
March Madness is upon us and time to review the rules. Not the rules of basketball; no, we're talking about my own Official College Basketball Rules of Picking "Your Team." I have to establish these rules because it's always just about this time of year that people who not only never attended Duke but have never, ever even BEEN to Durham, NC suddenly become pennant-waving, face-painting, Dick Vitale-imitating, Coach K-revering Cameron Crazies, and this HAS to stop.
Rooting for a college where you have no connection is one of the more heinous things you can do in sports. It's not something isolated to college- we have generations of non-Texas-resident Dallas Cowboys fans as testament to that fact- but it's more of an issue in college sports. So, without further ado, here are the rules:
1. You can only root for a school you attended, or
2. You can root for a team an immediate family member (spouse, child, parent, grandchild- no uncles or cousins) attended, or
3. You can root for a team on which you placed a substantial ($100. or more) bet, or on whom your entire office-pool bracket depends, or
4. Er, that's it.
That's not to say that you can't take a rooting interest from the negative angle- it is perfectly OK to root for "whoever's playing Duke," for example, or "anybody but Syracuse." But if you didn't go to a school, please, sit there quietly and enjoy the game.
I, on the other hand, do have a rooting interest based on rule number 1, and this year, my team- Villanova, where I loitered in the back of law school classes until they tired of me, shoved a diploma in my hand, and booted me onto Lancaster Avenue, never to darken its halls again- is a number one seed, which is a spot to which I am unaccustomed. Villanova is usually an underdog, at best a middle-of-the-pack seed, and nobody sees them coming until it's too late. In fact, they were an eight-seed the year that they managed to win the whole thing. 1985 was a good year. This year? I dunno- I always approach the tournament assuming that disaster will strike at any moment. Usually does.
But at least I don't root for Duke.